A legislation agency that after offered companies to FTX defended itself and tried to dismiss a category motion swimsuit by means of a authorized submitting on Sept. 22.
The related lawsuit started in August. There, clients tried to argue that Fenwick & West was partially responsible for alleged fraudulent exercise at FTX.
In its present submitting, Fenwick defended itself on varied grounds. It argued that plaintiffs did not allege that Fenwick acted outdoors of the scope of illustration.
Moreover, Fenwick mentioned that plaintiffs failed to point out that Fenwick knew about or immediately assisted FTX’s fraud, and failed to point out that or that Fenwick participated in a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) enterprise.
Every of these factors is important to clients’ authorized claims. Accordingly, Fenwick goals to have the category motion swimsuit dismissed by means of its newest authorized submitting.
Newest submitting discusses finer factors
Fenwick additionally addressed different factors. The legislation agency famous that plaintiffs didn’t argue that it “orchestrated” FTX’s fraud. As a substitute, plaintiffs repeatedly affirmed of their declare that former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried was liable for that fraud.
Fenwick asserted that it represented solely FTX, not Bankman-Fried or some other firm insider. It went on to notice that it was simply certainly one of many legislation corporations that represented FTX and in any other case described its companies as “routine” all through its submitting.
The legislation agency additionally responded to allegations that it offered sure companies that went “nicely past” the companies that legislation corporations usually present. Fenwick mentioned that these controversial companies concerned using legal professionals who freely left Fenwick to affix FTX, creating corporations by means of which Bankman-Fried later dedicated fraud, and advising FTX on regulatory compliance as associated to cryptocurrency buying and selling.
Fenwick famous that the plaintiffs don’t declare that these companies have been unsuitable or legally actionable in their very own proper. As a substitute, it mentioned that the plaintiffs argued that Fenwick is liable as a result of it offered authorized companies whereas it knew of FTX’s fraud.
Fenwick added that plaintiffs based mostly sure arguments on inferences concerning the legislation agency’s monitoring and diligence insurance policies, mixed with the truth that two Fenwick staff — Daniel Friedberg and Can Solar — left the legislation agency to work with FTX. To that finish, clients of their unique lawsuit drew consideration to a 2021 electronic mail by which Friedberg acknowledged cash-sharing between FTX and its sister agency Alameda Analysis.
As with varied different factors, Fenwick denied that the existence of this electronic mail plausibly exhibits that it was conscious of alleged wrongdoing at FTX.
The put up FTX’s one-time legislation agency denies consciousness of fraud, strikes to dismiss lawsuit appeared first on CryptoSlate.
