I get that the rivalry between L1 communities could possibly be justified to some extent (despite the fact that I feel that competitors and variety is a superb factor for us, the shoppers) however I actually don’t get the rivalry and tribalism between L2 communities. Aren’t all of us working for a similar actual aim? To enhance Ethereum?
There’s no deny that sure L2s and scaling options are merely higher than the opposite be it due to extra funding, longer time available in the market or a greater improvement staff over all.
I personally root so much for Polygon contemplating that they’ve probably the most funding and liquidity out of all different scaling options (and thats obvious by their allocation of $1 billion towards ZK tech improvement) plus additionally they have greater than 8 Ethereum scaling options every with its particular function. Lastly they already secured a ton of partnerships with main world corporations the likes of Instagram, Stripe and not too long ago Bentley.
My love for this scaling answer does NOT disregard different L2s and scaling options. I do know that they’re JUST AS IMPORTANT as this one. I simply occur to assist Polygon extra.
However the tribalism (particularly inside the Ethereum ecosystem) wants to finish. I’m in full assist of any improvement that occurs with Loopring, Zksync, Starkware or another Ethereum scaling options working laborious and sinking funds into making Ethereum a greater place for us as shoppers and supporters of Ethereum.
