Bournemouth boss Andoni Iraola was baffled why VAR opted to intervene and disallow Dango Ouattara’s injury-time effort towards Newcastle this afternoon.
Ouattara thought he had gained it for the hosts after seemingly assembly Lewis Prepare dinner’s right-wing nook along with his shoulder and the ball flying into the web.
Referee David Coote awarded the purpose however VAR swiftly dominated the ball had come off the ahead’s arm, enabling Newcastle to flee with some extent from a 1-1 draw.
Bournemouth’s hearts have been damaged by VAR ❌ pic.twitter.com/BcI2RuXMeG
— Sky Sports activities Premier League (@SkySportsPL) August 25, 2024
The Premier League described it as a ‘factual handball’ regardless of quite a few tv replays failing to conclusively present the ball had ricocheted in off the arm.
Iraola was lower than impressed, telling the BBC’s Match of the Day: “It was so apparent. I feel everybody who watches the sport would agree. I feel the shoulder, it by no means touches his pores and skin. We have now very brief sleeves. They are saying it’s factual, present me the details. I’ve simply seen the video and the very fact is it doesn’t contact the arm, it’s the shoulder, a transparent purpose and three factors for us.
“It’s one thing that isn’t even controversial. It’s undoubtedly not one thing for VAR to intervene. I’ve nothing towards the referee, he gave the purpose, they didn’t give him the possibility to see it once more. Somebody within the VAR, who supposedly shouldn’t be going to intervene an excessive amount of they are saying as a result of they belief the referee.
“It doesn’t matter I complain now, it’s two factors much less.”
Marcus Tavernier had handed Bournemouth a deserved first-half lead however Newcastle, impressed by the introduction of Harvey Barnes from the bench, grabbed a leveller when Anthony Gordon prodded house on the far publish with 14 minutes to go.
Newcastle boss Eddie Howe admitted it was a “contentious choice” to disallow Ouattara’s effort however felt his facet deserved some extent.
The previous Bournemouth supervisor mentioned: “I assumed the sport was misplaced as a result of I initially hadn’t seen something improper with the purpose. We have now had it each methods. We have now had it for us and towards us and we’re very grateful for that second as a result of now we have battled exhausting. What we had at that stage of the sport was a useful level. However I perceive that it’s a contentious choice.
“I feel a draw was truthful however Bournemouth might have a unique perspective. They did trigger us issues with their fast assaults and whereas I feel we had extra possibilities to attain multiple, I feel they might in all probability argue the identical. With that, I feel a draw was truthful.