Earlier this week, veteran freelance cricket commentator and journalist Peter Lalor was axed from radio station SEN’s cricket protection halfway by the Australian males’s Check tour of Sri Lanka resulting from his social media posts about Palestine.
Lalor, who over the previous 15 months has posted on X constantly in regards to the plight of Palestinians within the face of Israel’s onslaught of Gaza following the October 7 assaults, and of Israel’s current bombardment of the occupied territories, took to Cricket Et Al to announce his departure: “I’m positive it is going to come as a reduction to some to study that after 10 years you’ll not be listening to my voice on SEN anymore”.
A number of sports activities journalists within the Australian press pack have advised Crikey they’ve determined to boycott SEN following the choice, committing to not work with the community in future. The Australian press pack is a small, tight-knit group, with Lalor well-loved amongst it.
“SEN joyful to offer Tom Morris an opportunity after his complete ordeal, however Pete shares his political perception and it’s out on the road,” mentioned one journalist.
Hejaz Monetary Options, which prominently sponsored SEN in 2024, mentioned the Lalor axing had solidified its choice to not proceed enterprise with the radio station: “Given what has since transpired, we’re much more assured in our choice and don’t have any plans to revisit the partnership shifting ahead”. Following questions from Crikey, Hejaz posted an announcement on social media to the identical impact.
Lalor alluded to social media complainants on X as being instrumental in his departure, describing the web site as a “sewer”. Ralph Horowitz, a high-profile Melbourne sports activities media persona who has labored with SEN, its chief govt Craig Hutchison and in soccer extensively prior to now, mentioned he was “delighted” if any of his complaints on social media have been associated to Lalor’s departure.
Lalor mentioned the tip of his engagement with SEN adopted calls from senior administration who mentioned there have been “critical organisations making complaints”, and one other from Hutchison who requested Lalor if he “didn’t care that [his] retweeting of occasions in Gaza made Jewish folks in Melbourne really feel unsafe”:
The next day Hutchison advised me that as a result of the ‘sound of my voice made folks really feel unsafe’ and that individuals are ‘triggered by my voice’, I couldn’t cowl the cricket for them any extra.
In his assertion on Cricket Et Al, Lalor wrote, “I retweeted posts across the October 7 assault by Hamas; for the reason that IDF’s marketing campaign in Gaza nearly all of my retweeted posts have been in regards to the sufferings of Palestinians. The asymmetry of my retweeting displays what can now absolutely be seen because the asymmetry of the struggling.
“I’m moved by the deaths of innocents. That shouldn’t be too troublesome a place to know. I’ll proceed to have sympathy for the struggling of the Palestinian folks simply as I’ll proceed to be appalled by acts of antisemitism and terrorism.”
Lalor declined to remark additional when contacted, saying he wasn’t all in favour of dragging the matter out additional. He confirmed he was not contemplating authorized motion.
When SEN is within the media highlight, it’s understood Hutchison’s traditional inside observe is to make clear issues together with his workers by way of immediate all-staff conferences, however that no such assembly or communication passed off following the information of the Lalor choice.
Crikey despatched a sequence of inquiries to Hutchison relating to the choice, together with which organisations had made complaints, whether or not SEN was snug ending working relationships primarily based on political views and if workers have been free to specific a variety of political views, why SEN had engaged Lalor constantly over the previous 15 months, why he hadn’t contacted his wider workers relating to the Lalor information, whether or not he anticipated sponsor or accomplice backlash, and whether or not he can be open to Lalor returning to the community sooner or later.
Hutchison declined to reply, directing Crikey to a brief assertion supplied to the 9 papers.
“We’ve been in dialogue by the again half of the [first] Check about a number of the commentary on Peter’s non-public social media feed. Peter and I’ve a distinct view of the affect of that within the Australian neighborhood,” learn the assertion.
“SEN Cricket is a celebration of variations and nationalities and a spot the place our SEN viewers can escape what’s an more and more advanced and typically triggering world. We respect Pete as a journalist and long-time contributor to the sport but additionally acknowledge the concern that many households in our neighborhood really feel proper now, and we additionally have to respect that.”
SEN shareholder John Rothfield, who has additionally labored with Horowitz prior to now, advised the 9 papers he backed the choice to dismiss Lalor on business grounds.
SEN commentator Bharat Sundaresan described Lalor as a “righteous, compassionate and sort man” in a message of assist on social media. Public messages of assist additionally got here from Code Sports activities’ chief cricket author Daniel Cherny and Australian Check opener Usman Khawaja.
Have one thing to say about this text? Write to us at letters@crikey.com.au. Please embrace your full title to be thought-about for publication in Crikey’s Your Say. We reserve the proper to edit for size and readability.
