Kaspersky excels with its simple to make use of interface and automation options, whereas Bitdefender will get the sting on total detection charges and laboratory take a look at outcomes, however with a barely harder studying curve.
Cybersecurity threats have change into one of many largest considerations for companies of all sizes. These safety threats are sometimes more durable to detect than up to now, creating a way more tough activity for OpSec engineers searching for remediation options.
Two highly effective endpoint detection and response instruments being deployed around the globe are Kaspersky Endpoint Safety for Enterprise and Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Safety. Each of those EDR software program options present sturdy detection, elimination, and risk administration instruments. Beneath we’ll check out what Kaspersky and Bitdefender have in widespread, and the place every product pulls forward of the opposite.
SEE: Cellular machine safety coverage (TechRepublic Premium)
Soar to:
What’s Kaspersky?
Kaspersky Endpoint Safety for Enterprise is an EDR suite designed for small and enormous companies who want a scalable resolution for his or her OpSec necessities. With a concentrate on automation and automated duties, Kaspersky shines in smaller environments the place the staffing might not be accessible to dedicate to every activity.
Customers typically word it’s simple to make use of console interface as among the finest within the business, with a really quick studying curve wanted to have the ability to get probably the most out of it.
What’s Bitdefender?
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Safety appears to be like to fill the identical position as Kaspersky by providing an entire EDR resolution geared in the direction of SecOps professionals. Boasting larger laboratory detection scores than Kaspersky in exams comparable to MITRE, which mimic a state-sponsored cyberattack, Bitdefender is usually considered barely extra superior in its detection strategies.
Geared toward extra absolutely staffed SecOps, set up will be extra difficult with Bitdefender. Whereas it doesn’t have the concentrate on automation that Kaspersky does, Bitdefender does supply higher flexibility and customization for groups who’ve the manpower to reap the benefits of it.
Kaspersky vs. Bitdefender: Characteristic comparability
| Characteristic | Kaspersky | Bitdefender |
|---|---|---|
| Dashboard console | Sure | Sure |
| On-premise, cloud and hybrid console | Sure | Sure |
| Lockdown mode | Sure | No |
| Computerized sandbox | Sure | Sure |
| Computerized IoC detection and remediation | Sure | No |
| Machine studying detection | Sure | Sure |
Head-to-head comparability: Kaspersky vs. Bitdefender
Dashboard management console
Each Kaspersky and Bitdefender supply detailed dashboard consoles to entry all of the options and configurations for each instruments. Kaspersky makes use of the Kaspersky Safety Middle. This dashboard view is a favourite amongst customers with its simplicity and easy-to-learn interface and structure. It’s greatest for smaller companies or those that could not have the devoted employees to handle extra advanced instruments.
Bitdefender additionally affords a dashboard console, however it’s undoubtedly extra sophisticated than Kaspersky’s providing ,and customers typically really feel it is among the low factors of the software program. It’s very succesful, but it surely has a steep studying curve and isn’t intuitive or simple to decipher at first look. For that reason, it’s greatest suited to these bigger companies who’ve devoted employees to determine its nuances.
Deployment
Each of those choices are SaaS instruments and deployment is comparatively simple, however customers report Bitdefender to be the simpler of the 2 on this regard. Regardless of being simpler to make use of as soon as deployed, Kaspersky is barely slower to deploy within the first place for many conditions, in line with many SecOps engineers who’ve expertise with each.
Bitdefender has most options accessible out of the field, whereas Kaspersky has a barely extra feature-heavy mannequin with tiered modules and pricing for various performance. This could make it tough for smaller companies when figuring out precisely what they should configure for a brand new set up.
Detection and remediation
Kaspersky permits customers to set automated parameters and actions to happen for varied detections and different threats. This could alleviate numerous the workload for workers which can not have devoted groups or need to streamline their efforts.
Bitdefender doesn’t supply the identical stage of automation, however they do supply vulnerability administration which might look at tendencies and historical past throughout the community to identify weak spots. This may help velocity up duties related to cybersecurity audits and risk administration.
Selecting between Kaspersky and Bitdefender
Each of those EDR choices are properly examined and really succesful for companies of just about any measurement. They detect a variety of threats and supply dynamic choices to cope with these threats shortly.
The variations are principally within the person interface between the 2, with Kaspersky clearly leaning in the direction of smaller to medium sized companies with out devoted employees wanted to completely handle the software program. Their automation instruments additionally assist in working in the direction of this simpler strategy to EDR administration.
Bitdefender alternatively is rather more snug within the palms of devoted SecOps engineers the place the marginally harder interface and superior options will be absolutely taken benefit of.
