I had a revelation lately whereas testing the wired charging velocity of my trusty iPhone 16 Plus. In six months of possession, it occurred to me as I blew the mud out like an archaeologist analyzing an historical pot, I had by no means plugged a cable into my iPhone’s USB-C port. It appeared unattainable, but it surely was true.
And it made me suppose. Do iPhone house owners even want ports? When stories counsel that Apple is engaged on a smartphone with no port in any respect, everybody loses their minds. But when I can go half a yr with out utilizing my iPhone’s USB-C port and never even discover, the place’s the difficulty? If Apple desires to ditch the iPhone’s USB-C port, I say: Good.
The port on the backside of an iPhone was once completely elementary to its well-being. Whether or not 30-pin, Lightning, or latterly USB-C, the charging/knowledge port was the primary, usually the one route into or out of the iPhone. Except for charging, this port was very important within the early days for importing music and books onto the machine and getting pictures and movies off it. Syncing and backing up have been finished through a wired connection, too. However one after the other these makes use of switched from wired solely, to wired or wi-fi, to MagSafe, to who nonetheless makes use of a wire?
Most of us may have reminiscences of instances when the port connection turned unreliable, and of how a lot of a ache this was. From that time till you bought a brand new telephone the cable needed to be waggled in a selected approach to make it begin charging, or the telephone needed to be laid the other way up or at some bizarre angle. “Don’t use that cable,” you’d warn a buddy. “It solely performs properly with the official Apple one.” Simply one other of these trendy conveniences that make life hell.

MagSafe is already a implausible wi-fi choice for (most) iPhones.
shutterstock.com / serhatctk
Of late, nonetheless, this specific set of annoyances has pale into the background, not less than for me. I cost wirelessly in a single day when the slower velocity doesn’t matter. I get my music through streaming, not being 87 years outdated, and I switch all the pieces else wirelessly to and from the telephone, this not being 2009. Actually, the one time I’ve wanted the port since I purchased the telephone is to check how efficient the port is.
Okay, you’re saying: bully for you, you don’t want the port. However what’s the issue with retaining it as an choice? The place’s the hurt? The hurt, my Socratic buddy, is that together with a design ingredient the consumer doesn’t want is a waste of assets and a explanation for pointless compromises. As I defined when defending the notch a number of years in the past, seemingly remoted design selections have a knock-on impact all through the remainder of the product. And if Apple was capable of ditch the USB-C port it could be capable of make the telephone higher in varied different methods.
Most clearly, having a bodily opening on a telephone is simply asking for undesirable issues to work their means inside. The mud I discussed earlier; water, and spilled espresso. The iPhone 16 Plus has a superb ingress-protection ranking of IP68 but it surely took Apple greater than a decade to achieve that time as a result of the port made it so troublesome to maintain mud and water out of the machine. Open up your iPhone and also you’ll see quite a few design diversifications and compromises across the port module to waterproof the entire equipment; these might be ditched tomorrow if the port wasn’t there, releasing up room inside the chassis. That’s on prime of the room you’d acquire from eradicating the port module itself, after all.
Should you’ve bought further room contained in the chassis you’ll be able to set up an even bigger battery, or transfer different parts round right into a extra optimum configuration. Eradicating the port might allow Apple to have a speaker throughout the complete width of the underside edge, and it could make accessing the internals of your telephone for repairs an easier course of.
It might even allow the corporate to make its iPhones thinner, transcending a limitation at the moment imposed by the thickness of the port. This yr’s Oppo Discover N5, which resorts to a custom-designed USB-C port to shave off each doable millimeter, is an effective instance of the way in which through which producers are hitting a brick wall of their quest for ever-slimmer telephones. So long as clients insist on plugging cables into their telephones, corporations received’t be capable of get the scale down any additional.

Foundry | Alex Walker-Todd
Possibly the most important cause why I would like Apple to ditch the USB-C port, nonetheless, is that it’s going to power the business, and society, to lastly chew the bullet and absolutely embrace wi-fi. Apple has large weight as a power for change. When iPhones courageously stopped having 3.5mm headphone jacks, accent makers shifted their focus from wired to wi-fi (or in some circumstances, for a time, Lightning or USB-C) headphones, and such units turned cheaper, higher, and extra broadly obtainable and understood. If a bit of rich iPhone house owners all of a sudden misplaced their USB-C ports, Android producers would possible observe swimsuit, and the identical factor would occur for wi-fi chargers.
Automobiles would begin to be offered as normal with Qi2 magnetic mounts reasonably than, or in addition to, the cable ports many at the moment supply. Wi-fi charging pucks would develop into commonplace in houses and workplaces. And corporations (together with, I’d count on, Apple itself, as a result of it could be eager to appease EU regulators) would throw their weight behind the event of quicker, extra environment friendly and longer-distance wi-fi charging requirements in a means that may be much less interesting if wired was nonetheless a simple choice.
I don’t think about for a second that the USB-C port would disappear in a single day. If the iPhone 18 sequence, for instance, turned out to be portless, there would nonetheless be an iPhone 17e with a port, to not point out older generations nonetheless on sale at a cheaper price. For many who nonetheless desire a port, the choice would stay–possible for a few years, if the gradual dying of the House button is something to go by.
No one could be compelled to hitch the revolution straight away. However the revolution is coming, and the earlier we get began, the higher.