Bad ads are killing the mobile gaming experience – here’s how we fix it

Keep Knowledgeable

Get Trade Information In Your Inbox…

Signal Up In the present day

These aren’t simply buzzwords – they’re the kinds of “dangerous adverts” quietly eroding belief, irritating gamers and placing long-term development in danger. Whereas some creatives could ship a short-term spike in installs, the fee to model fairness and participant loyalty is changing into too steep to disregard.

If the cellular gaming trade is critical about sustainable development, studios have to reclaim management of the advert expertise. Nonetheless, as the dimensions of cellular promoting grows, so does the complexity of managing it. Billions of adverts are served day by day – many dynamically generated or behaviorally focused – and that scale makes guide oversight almost unattainable. And even when studios invested within the expertise and tech to determine and block disturbing advert content material, they might nonetheless be blind to the malicious code and technical breakdowns hidden deep within the artistic that flip adverts into nightmares.

In the present day’s dangerous adverts aren’t simply annoying – they’re aggressive, advanced and sometimes dangerous. The Participant Sentiment on In-Recreation Advertisements report, primarily based on a survey of cellular players and revealed by AppHarbr, identifies a rising disconnect between advert high quality and participant expectations. It reveals that 58 % of gamers will give up a sport instantly attributable to disruptive adverts, and 84 % will uninstall after repeated publicity. These aren’t remoted incidents—they symbolize a systemic risk to participant retention.

Combating dangerous adverts with higher labels

Pinpointing which adverts are doing probably the most harm is important, which is why “it is important to have a shared, structured technique to outline the worst offenders,” Alex Yerukhimovich, Normal Supervisor at AppHarbr, advised me on the PocketGamer.biz podcast. He urges studios to transcend surface-level points and perceive the deeper patterns behind dangerous advert experiences.

“It begins with a extra detailed taxonomy,” Yerukhimovich says. “That offers advert monetization groups and advert ops professionals the readability to identify recurring patterns, perceive how gamers are reacting and resolve when—and the way—to step in to filter undesirable adverts to match participant expectations.”

1. Non-Skippable & Intrusive Advertisements

These adverts interrupt reasonably than combine. From autoplay movies with misleading shut buttons to playables that lure customers in countless loops, these codecs sabotage the participant expertise. And whereas as soon as hailed as premium, even playables are being subverted by darkish patterns.

AppHarbr’s analysis discovered that 93 % of gamers abandon video games with misleading ‘X’ buttons, and 45 % delete a sport attributable to overly frequent interstitials. These numbers converse volumes—and so do gaming trade leaders.

John Wright – former VP of Cell Video games at Kwalee turned gaming marketing consultant and investor, gives a sensible perspective on the issue. In case you noticed one thing offensive in a Harrods window, you’d most likely stroll away,” he explains. “It’s the identical when gamers encounter poor or offensive adverts – they go away.”

He’s additionally seen how underhand techniques, like forcing clicks earlier than an ‘X’ seems, distort efficiency knowledge and hurt belief. “It falsifies outcomes. Gamers are compelled to click on simply to exit, and that click on will get counted – even when the consumer wasn’t within the sport,” he says. “It’s dangerous for expertise, and it misleads everybody downstream.”

2. Malicious & Deceptive Advertisements

These creatives cross the road and vary from irritating to harmful. Faux system warnings, prize scams and gameplay trailers that misrepresent the precise expertise erode consumer belief. In accordance with the Interactive Promoting Bureau (IAB), 56 % of cellular players have encountered adverts that blatantly misrepresent gameplay – a disconnect that breeds frustration, distrust and churn.

Some misleading techniques have gotten more durable to detect, and Piyush Mishra, Director of Development Advertising at Product Insanity, warns that groups throughout all genres are struggling to maintain tempo. “One of many largest points that has come up in our promoting trade and it has grow to be free-for-all,” he says.

What’s most alarming, he provides, is how problematic messaging continues to slide by means of – simply dressed in a different way. “We’re seeing advertisers push related messaging in more and more disguised methods,” Mishra notes. “It’s getting more durable to identify what’s deceptive – and when these slip by means of, the harm isn’t simply misleading. It’s usually deeply offensive.”

3. Sexist & Offensive Advertisements

Maybe probably the most surprising class, these adverts replicate deeper points in monetisation tradition. AppHarbr has documented examples of creatives the place ladies are burned, assaulted or humiliated – they usually proceed to seem in apps licensed by main app shops.

That’s a dangerous transfer in a market the place feminine gamers now make up almost half of all players within the U.S. alone. And when offensive content material crosses a line, the influence goes far past complaints. “When the content material crosses a line, feminine gamers don’t simply complain – they give up,” observes Jack Dunne, who leads Analysis Operations at playtesting and participant insights platform PlaytestCloud.

Disturbing adverts don’t solely alienate ladies – they have an effect on all gamers. PlaytestCloud interviews and inner knowledge present male gamers additionally specific “critical discomfort” with sexualised or suggestive content material, particularly when same-sex narratives really feel out of context or inappropriate for the sport.

Primarily based on these periods, Dunne says discomfort usually escalates into disengagement — and finally, churn. “Which means builders aren’t simply shedding a consumer, but additionally a strong advocate.”

Why the repair begins with studios

Fixing the ecosystem begins with inner accountability.

It’s the strategy Wright advocates, having seen first-hand how studios underestimate the price of letting low-quality or offensive creatives run unchecked. “They assume they’re getting extra installs or increased CPMs,” he says. “However what’s actually occurring is that they’re damaging their very own storefront—their sport, their stock, their popularity.”

Model is on the road, and studios can’t afford to play defence. 

It’s not sufficient to shift all of the blame to advert networks – though they do play a job. In a local weather the place a backlash towards “surprising adverts” is rising quick, so is the strain on studios to take possession of the entire participant expertise and duty for a way adverts seem and influence gameplay, notion and participant loyalty.

“Combating again begins with advert monetization and ops groups recognising that dangerous advert high quality isn’t an remoted oversight; it’s an issue of scale,” Yerukhimovich explains. With dynamic variations and auto-optimised placements flooding the ecosystem, automation is essential – however so is constant oversight. “Interstitial and rewarded placements delivered by high networks are driving customers to offensive and dangerous creatives. And these creatives are slipping by means of approvals,” he provides. 

In different phrases, studios face greater than only a content material downside – they face a quantity disaster. With out good methods to set and implement insurance policies concerning the adverts served and get rid of dangerous adverts at scale, even well-meaning publishers danger changing into supply automobiles for the worst offenders.

Ignore the advert expertise, and the fallout comes quick. Studios aren’t simply setting themselves as much as destroy model fairness and diminish participant belief – they open the door to public and regulatory backlash.

On March 20, 2025, the UK’s Promoting Requirements Authority (ASA) introduced a crackdown on cellular sport adverts, banning eight creatives for objectifying ladies and selling coercive, non-consensual eventualities. These included promotions for video games like Linky: Chat With Characters AI, My Fantasy, and Love Sparks: Courting Sim, with rulings citing clear violations of promoting codes round social duty and gender portrayal.

Simply weeks earlier, on March 4, 2025, a Sky Information investigation revealed the disturbing rise of misogynistic tropes – significantly the ‘Assist the Lady’ narrative – in cellular sport adverts.

These creatives usually featured ladies in misery, humiliation, or hazard as a method to impress clicks, elevating moral considerations and reinforcing dangerous stereotypes.

Regulators and media are turning up the warmth, and studios that fail to behave are taking part in with hearth.

From firefighting to stream

The issue is systemic. The repair needs to be, too.

Božo Jankovic, Head of Enterprise Improvement at Recreation Biz Consulting, advises studios to take the lead in redefining how they handle advert high quality. The start line, he says, is seeing advert expertise as central to the general consumer expertise. In apply, groups should align monetization, UA, and dwell ops round a shared understanding of what’s acceptable.

“This can be a cross-functional problem,” Jankovic explains. “Studios that succeed are embedding advert high quality into QA pipelines, constructing alert methods primarily based on participant suggestions, and strengthening relationships with advert tech suppliers.”

Throughout the trade, studios are creating streamlined workflows to triage complaints, outline artistic requirements and implement advert insurance policies in real-time – they usually’re seeing actual outcomes. It’s not nearly harm management; it’s about creating persistently higher advert experiences.

It is the hands-on strategy Ora Zilberman, Monetisation Supervisor at Playtika, follows to construct participant belief. “When gamers report points, I instantly accumulate particulars – consumer IDs, advert networks, timestamps – and escalate on to the advert supplier,” she explains. “If a artistic crosses the road, we block it. Interval. It is all about respect and reliability.”

Vincent Fervier, CMO at TapNation, takes this additional, calling for publishers to “proactively unite” round shared artistic requirements. “By talking with one voice and pushing again when adverts fall brief, we set clearer expectations and shield our communities.”

Smarter methods, sharper requirements

Studios get excessive marks for refining their advert high quality administration methods. However the actual alternative lies in an strategy that stops dangerous adverts earlier than they attain gamers.
In apply, Yerukhimovich identified on the podcast, this implies empowering advert monetisation groups with instruments that present real-time management over disruptive advert behaviour, artistic content material, and coverage violations. “It’s not about dictating what’s acceptable. It’s about giving publishers the instruments and insights to set and implement their very own requirements.”

For TapNation’s Fervier, efforts must transcend establishing finest practices to constructing a aggressive edge. “We have to elevate the bar,” he says. “Advert high quality straight influences participant retention.”

With 213 million players within the U.S. alone and international gaming advert spend anticipated to achieve $11.5 billion by 2027, the strain to behave is bigger than ever.

Dangerous adverts are usually not inevitable. Lasting change requires publishers, studios, and platforms to align on increased requirements and maintain one another accountable. A poor advert expertise in cellular gaming can break belief, however an distinctive one can construct far stronger connections.