I used to be studying some documentation on the Ethereum.org web site on how the Optimism Customary Bridge works (at a high-level, not a developer, only a retail particular person).
From what I acquired out of the article is that the usual bridge is a “easy” mint/burn process i.e., lock up ETH on L1 after which mint the identical quantity of ETH on L2, vice/versa.
It takes 7-days for L2 to bridge again to L1 utilizing the usual bridge (problem interval)?
On the finish of the article, and from observing on the bridging hyperlink, there are third get together bridges that allow sooner withdrawal from L2 again to mainnet. Does this work as a result of persons are depositing/staking their very own property and are creating some type of liquidity swimming pools? Are these third get together bridges as secure as the usual bridge, or are they extra centralised and never trustless as a result of it requires folks to deposit property into contracts?
Why would one need to use the usual bridge with the 7-day lock-up? What prevents most individuals from utilizing the third-party bridge apart from liquidity points (assuming that my liquidity pooling idea is appropriate?
Are the entire third get together bridges from Optimism to mainnet secure to make use of, or ought to one watch for audits? There appear to be many third get together bridges.
For individuals who present liquidity to third get together bridges, is it attainable for them to get rugged by the builders?
Additionally, is it attainable for Ethereum to implement State Proofs (from Algorand) to assist safe bridging to L2s, or is that primarily cross-chain
