Actress and sex-positivity advocate Emily Ratajkowski has defended her option to put on what she considers “probably the most controversial gown I’ve ever worn”.
In Harper Bazaar’s Style Flashback, the mannequin appeared again on the sheer cut-out black gown she wore to the 2016 Harper’s Bazaar Icons social gathering that stirred up substantial controversy.
“I had no concept what a scene this is able to trigger. It was a gown,” she stated within the video. “I am unable to bear in mind – anyone referred to as it ‘extraordinarily vulgar’ and it grew to become this large controversy on the web.”
Watch the video above.
READ MORE: Carly Simon’s two sisters die simply sooner or later aside from most cancers: ‘Their loss shall be lengthy and haunting‘
Ratajkowski talked about that even her brokers have been “mad” at her for sporting the gown because it was “too attractive”
“I do know this sounds no matter, however I used to be in my 20s and simply hadn’t registered that it was so attractive – as a result of there’s a panel within the center, nevertheless it appears like there is not.”
“It brought about this entire factor. After which I principally referred to as the one who stated it was a vulgar gown ‘sexist,’ and there was drama.”
READ MORE: Sophia Grace Brownlee, who went viral on YouTube and the Ellen Present, reveals being pregnant information
The critic in particular person was style guide Tim Gunn. On an episode of Style Police, he stated the gown was “so appallingly vulgar and revealing. Why put on something? Why not simply take all of it off?”
This was proper across the time Ratajkowski had penned an op-ed for Glamour through which she denounced males for making a double customary for “attention-seeking” ladies.
She doubled down on her level after Gunn’s feedback in a tweet. ”After I wrote my Glamour article, I used to be simply considering of males who name ladies attention-seeking for being attractive. I wasn’t even considering of the hosts of nationally televised reveals who name ladies vulgar as a result of they’ll see their stomachs.”
READ MORE: Freeze Body: How Princess Diana saved John Travolta’s profession with a 15-minute dance
“I used to be principally referred to as out for wanting consideration, which I feel is attention-grabbing – since you go to crimson carpets for consideration. Primarily, it is a part of your job as a celeb,” she mirrored within the video.
“I personally nonetheless stand behind it. I like that look,” she added.
For a each day dose of 9Honey, subscribe to our e-newsletter right here.
Sheer enchantment: Celebs who dare to reveal in see-through clothes
