Under you will notice the Closing Jeopardy clue for Tuesday, February 18, 2025. The quarterfinals of the Jeopardy Invitational Event continues after yesterday’s match, with high-ranked participant Matt Amodio getting by in a good match. Tonight’s episode will characteristic marketing consultant Jaskaran Singh from Texas, Ph.D scholar Skyler Hornback from Kentucky, and homemaker Margaret Shelton from Pennsylvania. Statistically, it’s projected that Jaskaran and Margaret can have a reasonably shut battle. Right here is the query and reply for Closing Jeopardy on 2/18/2025, plus the wagers and the winner of the sport.
Closing Jeopardy Query for February 18
The Closing Jeopardy query for February 18, 2025 is within the class of “Supreme Courtroom Choices” and has the next clue:
This landmark case was reported within the N.Y. Occasions not on the entrance web page however in “Information of the Railroads”
The right response to this clue, per standard, may be discovered on the finish of this text.
Closing Jeopardy Wagers and Winner for February 18
Jaskaran gained the February 18 match with a runaway lead, as his nearest competitor Margaret risked an excessive amount of on a Each day Double.
With $21,800, Jaskaran didn’t have to get the Closing Jeopardy clue right, however he did anyway. He risked nothing however nonetheless got here out on prime and turns into a semifinalist.
Skyler had $7,100 and misplaced $3,500 together with his incorrect reply of “Pullman vs. United States.” He led to second place with $3,600.
Margaret solely had $6,200 and risked all of it. Nevertheless, she couldn’t provide you with a response and completed in third with $0.
Closing Jeopardy Reply for February 18
The right reply for Closing Jeopardy on February 18, 2025 is “What’s Plessy v. Ferguson?”
The clue is relatively imprecise with the point out of “railroad” with out a lot else of a touch. Nevertheless, the case of Plessy v. Ferguson is relatively notorious, with the U.S. Supreme Courtroom ruling that Jim Crow legal guidelines that created racial segregation didn’t violate the Structure.
In 1892 Plessy entered a whites-only practice automotive (therefore, the deal with railroads right here) as a mixed-race individual and was charged beneath Louisiana’s Separate Automobile Act of 1890. Although Plessy appealed to the Supreme Courtroom, it determined towards him 7 to 1, successfully legitimizing additional segregation legal guidelines all through the nation.
It wasn’t till the Brown vs Board of Schooling case in 1954 that segregation in public training was dominated unconstitutional, making Plessy v. Ferguson lifeless as a authorized precedent.
