“I don’t wish to see protests on our road in any respect, from anyone,” New South Wales Police Minister Yasmin Catley mentioned within the days following Hamas’ atrocities towards Israeli civilians on October 7, 2023. “I don’t assume anyone actually does.”
Her authorities actually legislates as if that’s the case, and is way from alone in doing so.
On February 21 this 12 months, NSW handed new legal guidelines aimed toward limiting the precise to protest. It gave police further powers to maneuver on protesters close to locations of worship and to threaten any conduct that might be construed as harassment or intimidation of worshippers with as much as two years in jail. It additionally broadens the protection of NSW’s protest allow system.
Associated Article Block Placeholder
Article ID: 1184089
In the meantime, in December final 12 months, Victoria proposed its personal crackdown on dissent. Prone to be launched in March, it’ll ban using face masks at protests, allow “no protest” zones — of as but unspecified dimension — round locations of worship, and permit police to grab “attachment units” resembling glue, locks, chains and ropes.
In response to a brand new report from the Australian Democracy Community (ADN), co-written by the Grata Fund, the clamps on protesters are solely getting tighter:
The speed at which individuals who protest are sentenced to imprisonment after participating in peaceable protest is intensifying in Australia.
Over the past three years, 9 activists engaged in civil disobedience have been sentenced to a mixed whole of fifty months imprisonment.
Two main streams have prompted this most up-to-date flurry of laws, Anastasia Radievska, protest rights campaigner at ADN, advised Crikey.
First is the pro-Palestine protests, “in all probability probably the most constant, longest-running social motion by way of public assemblies in Australia”. The second main goal, as we’ve lengthy lined, is local weather protesters.
“Australia leads the world by way of arresting local weather protesters,” Radievska mentioned. “There was some analysis finished final 12 months on a world stage that positioned us primary. However this [research] offers it a extra concrete type of form, which is that the speed at which activists are being given jail sentences has elevated by about 10 instances within the final 5 years. For the reason that finish of 2020, there’s additionally extra punitive bail circumstances being imposed which might be functioning as a type of de facto punishment, even earlier than any individual goes to trial for a protest-related offence.”
Alongside this, Radievska mentioned, is extra preemptive policing of protests and an elevated “militarisation” of police forces.
“We’re seeing much more … folks being visited and advised that in the event that they go to a sure protest, they’ll be convicted, they’ll be committing an offence,” she mentioned.
An open letter to Victorian Premier Jacinta Allen from 21 civil society organisations — together with Quakers Victoria, Islamic Council of Victoria, Liberty Victoria and Victorian Aboriginal Authorized Service — argues:
There is no such thing as a credible correlation between latest prison acts and the train of the precise to protest. Limiting the precise to protest wouldn’t have prevented the abhorrent crimes seen in latest months.
The strikes in NSW and Victoria are of a bit with the actions of a number of state governments lately.
In mid-2023, the South Australian authorities — across the similar time power minister Tom Koutsantonis was telling the fossil-fuel trade his celebration was “at your disposal” — handed harsh anti-protest legal guidelines.
In Australia’s most specific petro-state, Western Australia, there have been a collection of raids and arrests by WA’s counterterrorism police aimed toward climate-related protesters.
Tasmania handed harsher penalties for protesters in 2022 — to not point out the 2017 legal guidelines that had been finally struck down by the Excessive Courtroom — and Tasmania-based protester Colette Harmsen lately served three months in jail.
Radievska says we’re seeing the importation of the identical ways used within the US, with political leaders explicitly throwing round threats to protesters’ residencies previously week. Going ahead, she says the banner of social cohesion will nearly actually be deployed for comparable ends.
“I feel that one factor to notice is methods aimed toward furthering that cleavage between activists and ‘mainstream society’ usually assault the cut up between advocacy organisations and activists,” she mentioned. “So, attempting to punish organisations who assist protest or who have interaction in advocacy themselves.”
She factors to the instance of Victoria’s initiative, launched below the heading “Sturdy Motion To Combat Hate And Assist Victoria Heal”, which would require multicultural organisations to watch a “social cohesion pledge” in the event that they want to apply for presidency grants.
Associated Article Block Placeholder
Article ID: 1197847
“The circumstances of that pledge haven’t but been made public, however you’ll be able to guess that there can be some component there round sure sorts of advocacy and supporting sure sorts of social actions,” she mentioned. The pledge is explicitly connected to a need to “stamp out excessive and radical influences in public protests”.
In fact, the suppression of protest is only one component of Australia’s ever-expanding police state. Victoria’s authorities lately bragged of its proposal to introduce “Australia’s hardest bail legal guidelines” whereas governments on the state and federal ranges have launched harsher legal guidelines on hate speech within the aftermath of the Dural caravan saga.
Premier Chris Minns has defended the rushed laws and has dominated out repealing them regardless of the obvious terrorist plot being a hoax, whereas backbenchers have referred to as for the federal hate crime legal guidelines, handed with bipartisan assist in early February, to be repealed.
The legal guidelines, first launched to Parliament in September 2024, had been handed in February after Labor agreed to Coalition calls for that the legal guidelines comprise provisions for obligatory sentencing, in opposition to Labor’s platform on the follow.
Extra broadly, this course of is a part of 1 / 4 of a century of shrinking civil rights, increasing surveillance and harsher punishments within the identify of Australia’s nationwide safety. Previous to 2001, Australia had no legal guidelines particularly aimed toward terrorism. By 2014, there have been greater than 60. By 2021, it was greater than 90.
Have one thing to say about this text? Write to us at letters@crikey.com.au. Please embody your full identify to be thought-about for publication in Crikey’s Your Say. We reserve the precise to edit for size and readability.
