Julian Assange story Truth on stage at Malthouse Theatre

We reside in a post-WikiLeaks world. We now take it with no consideration that, say, the horrors occurring in Gaza shall be shared with us, unbiased of official messaging. However, the surveillance state feels so entrenched it not often appears to elicit greater than a shrug from most of the people.

It’s troublesome to recollect how revolutionary the second was when, across the flip of the final decade, WikiLeaks first got here to prominence. The usage of know-how to shift the disparity of knowledge entry between governments and the ruled had the potential to create a genuinely new world.

At its strongest factors, Patricia Cornelius’ new play,Reality, which opened at Melbourne’s Malthouse Theatre this week, reinforces that precept: that what WikiLeaks sought was not merely revelation for the sake of it, or holding energy to account (although this was actually a part of it). At its basis, it wished to create a brand new relationship between folks and energy, and thus between them and their very own lives.

In Reality, 5 actors depict WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. They jet round a single, sparse set that options 5 desks with early desktop computer systems, a again wall made up of 5 cages, a flurry of CCTV cameras and, above these, 12 linked television-sized screens. The brisk, polemic present rattles by means of Assange’s story, the actors rhythmically buying and selling traces and sometimes assembly in unison like an acapella group.

This conceit is frankly a bit naff at instances, significantly in a careless opening section devoted to Assange’s faculty days. The actors take turns imitating schoolyard bullies, calling the younger Assange — already smarter and fewer able to compromise than anybody else he is aware of — a freak and a weirdo. It efficiently transported me again to my faculty days, besides it was conjuring the expertise not of being bullied however of being at assemblies watching an overzealous theatre troupe carry out a godawful play about tolerance.

Issues enhance tremendously as soon as we get to Assange’s immersion within the early web, the place he finds human connection, limitless prospects and issues worthy of his mind and ambition. He and his affiliate’s “moral hacking” of a few of the world’s most safe web sites leads him to the philosophical foundations of WikiLeaks, the organisation that may finally fulfil his frequent promise to alter the world.

The early scandals that WikiLeaks publishes flood into the general public area, but Assange is baffled and livid at their comparatively low impression. Then comes US Military Non-public Chelsea Manning, who fingers over the a whole bunch of hundreds of paperwork hat will come to be referred to as the Afghanistan Conflict logs, the Iraq Conflict logs and “Cablegate“.

“Collateral Homicide“, essentially the most infamous of WikiLeaks’ revelations, is performed practically in full on the fastened screens above. The grainy aerial footage of a US army Apache helicopter firing upon a gaggle of Iraqi males — together with two Reuters journalists, in addition to the lads who come to assistance from the wounded and a minimum of one youngster — is silent however for the casually bloodthirsty commentary of these doing the killing. To witness it’s simply as chilling because it was the primary time, even after, say, 18 months of brutal social media footage emanating from Gaza. The footage fades and that silence lingers.

Then we get to Sweden. Assange is “drunk on success”, events exhausting in between seminars and conferences and, upon leaving for the UK, finds out through the media that he’s wished for questioning in relation to allegations of rape and sexual assault.

The inclusion of the ladies’s experiences is dealt with properly, in addition to it may be. What we all know of their tales and the way we all know it’s deftly and uncomfortably sketched. What’s lacking is any actual reflection on what did or didn’t occur from Assange’s character (and given his is the first voice we hear, the play at massive). In a bit explicitly about energy and fact, the presumably that Assange grossly and deceitfully abused the ability out there to him (the alleged occasions happen in the course of the peak of his fame, and the 2 ladies are each honest admirers) is subsumed within the flood of all the things else that occurs. Nonetheless, one can come away with no different conclusion than that, nonetheless vile Assange’s alleged behaviour in direction of these ladies was, what occurred to him over the following 13 years had completely nothing to do with attaining justice for them.

We then have a stretch devoted to the harrowing remedy of Assange and Manning throughout their time in captivity. We’re instructed of the torturous situations Manning (performed by Eva Rees) is subjected to as she begins serving what is going to finally be seven years of a 25-year sentence. She is stripped bare earlier than explaining why she felt she needed to make the data out there to the general public. Assange, after greater than a decade in captivity of 1 variety or one other, says, vocal chords tightening in ache, “I’ve misplaced one thing”. The exemplary punishment of Assange and Manning and others sickens us anew.

We then meet Edward Snowden, about to blow the whistle on the NSA’s spying on US allies, to not point out Americans. He reinforces the concept that a citizen’s proper to entry info that issues them — and hold non-public info that issues no-one else — are common ideas underlying what it’s to be human: “Saying you don’t have anything to worry when you’ve got nothing to cover is like saying you don’t care about freedom of speech as a result of you don’t have anything to say — it’s a deeply anti-social precept.”

Most bold and arguably only, the play additional underlines these concepts as common ideas by twice veering away from Assange altogether, to discover different kinds of silencing and surveillance. These tales — one a couple of household reeling from the abuse of considered one of their kids, the opposite a couple of girl being surveilled by an abusive accomplice — scale the play’s themes right down to the person degree, and are as vivid and nuanced as something within the main story.

Reality will not be a refined piece, however possibly subtlety will not be what this story wants. Certainly, if something, I discovered myself noting the locations it may have gone additional. Assange mentions at one level he has been deserted by the Australian authorities; he may have added that he was additionally largely deserted by the media who had fed fortunately on his revelations (and handily averted the sort of penalties he confronted). Manning’s section is totally harrowing, however once more, may have gone additional — after years of imprisonment, she tried suicide, for which she confronted additional costs, the topic of a listening to at which she was granted no authorized illustration, nor witnesses.

Because the play presses ahead all zeal and momentum, it’s not at all times clear that it has whole management over its personal contradictions. In selecting to recount Assange’s story in Assange’s phrases, one wonders whether or not the makers are deliberately dashing by means of any boundaries to Assange as an uncomplicatedly heroic determine, or merely speaking his grandiose self-conception and what it made attainable.

There may be primarily no dialogue right here, only a near-relentless, information-heavy monologue carved into fifths. It will get tiring. However once more, certainly that’s a part of the entire level, the entire venture Reality chronicles. Assange, Manning, Snowden and the journalists they work with aren’t speaking to one another — they’re speaking to us. Whether or not it’s the atrocities dedicated in our title, however with out our information, or the jail situations confronted by whistleblowers, Reality reminds us many times: We can not say we didn’t know. We now have been instructed.

Have one thing to say about this text? Write to us at letters@crikey.com.au. Please embrace your full title to be thought-about for publication in Crikey’s Your Say. We reserve the fitting to edit for size and readability.