Media is limiting tax debate in Australia

Bernard Keane is the first purpose I keep a subscription to Crikey. I don’t agree with every part he writes, however he at all times makes me assume and his scathing evaluation of the parlous state of our coverage debate is often spot on. On Monday, although, he revealed a shocker of a chunk in regards to the “reckless spending” of presidency on Medicare and the character of our tax debate, one I can’t let go with out a response.

Firstly, let’s handle this howler. Regardless of linking to an article within the Monetary Evaluate about Ken Henry’s wonderful speech final Thursday at Per Capita’s Group Tax Summit in Melbourne, he went on to claim that the “solely gamers within the tax reform debate are grasping peddlers of self-interest just like the Enterprise Council, their shills within the media and the beneficiaries of the present tax system — AKA rich child boomers and gen Xers — who need to maintain the rip-off of younger individuals going.”

Simply what does Keane assume that summit was all about, if not an indication by 15 group and non-profit organisations that they, and the individuals they symbolize, are eager individuals in that tax debate?

We labored collaboratively over summer season, when many of the “beneficiaries of the present tax system” have been lounging at their vacation houses in Portsea and Palm Seaside, to kick off a giant dialog about tax reform forward of the federal election.

It’s not simple to get extraordinary individuals, and those that work on the coalface of addressing poverty and drawback in Australia, collectively to speak about tax reform. As Keane has usually bemoaned — and apparently supposed to once more on Monday — that debate is dominated by vested pursuits, rent-seekers and people with the means to pay extra to monetary advisers. These advisers assist them pay far much less tax than they might if they only contributed their justifiable share of tax on massive enterprise income and wealth from tax advantaged property.

So it’s passing unusual that Keane wouldn’t even acknowledge that Henry was given the platform for his excoriating speech by a gaggle of poorly funded, unbiased, non-profit organisations who’re determined to wrest management of that debate away from the highly effective.

Together with Ken’s opening handle, we heard keynote speeches from tax knowledgeable Professor Miranda Stewart and well-being financial system chief Dr Katherine Trebeck. Panel discussions coated tax’s interrelationship with housing, healthcare, social help and welfare and featured audio system akin to Cassandra Goldie, Angela Jackson, Roger Wilkins, Saul Eslake, Travers McLeod, Alan Kohler, Sharon Bessell and Kasy Chambers.

Different panels canvassed choices for broadening the tax base akin to revisiting carbon pricing, higher methods to tax wealth and property together with superannuation and land, shifting incentives away from rent-seeking and hypothesis in direction of funding and productiveness features, and tackling worldwide tax avoidance. These conversations have been led by specialists akin to Helen Hodgson, Jason Ward, Mark Zirnsak, Warwick Smith, Miranda Stewart, Thomas Walker and the Superpower Institute’s Baethan Mullen.

Keane mentions none of them. He additionally overlooks the wonderful analysis and advocacy work being executed by Tax Summit companions to broaden the scope of our tax dialog, akin to Assume Ahead’s Tax Wealth Not Work marketing campaign, Oxfam’s Takers Not Makers, and Per Capita’s personal Annual Tax Survey, which is now in its fifteenth 12 months.

All this materials was despatched to Crikey forward of the summit, together with different media retailers, however our data present that editors didn’t even open the e-mail with the great media pack connected.

So who’s answerable for limiting the voices in our public debate on tax? Is it the 15 group sector organisations and greater than 300 individuals throughout the nation who participated within the two-day summit, or the media who fail to cowl — or apparently even discover — any voices apart from the standard suspects?

I may go away it there, however I can’t ignore Keane’s ideological assault on common well being care.

To assert that “Australia doesn’t must be spending $8.5 billion encouraging GPs to bulk-bill everybody — and particularly not the half the inhabitants with above-average incomes” reveals a transparent ideological opposition to common healthcare in favour of a US-style user-pays system with only a “security internet” for many who are unable to pay market charges for major care.

I gained’t go into my household’s current expertise with the well being system in Australia, however suffice it to say that, even after we have been each working and had an above common family earnings, the price of treating and managing my late husband’s continual and compounding diseases, incapacity and eventual demise meant we got here near shedding our residence. It’s been a mammoth battle to revive monetary safety for myself and our younger daughter since his demise two years in the past, and I’ve myself skipped going to the GP on a couple of event as a result of the out-of-pocket prices have been too excessive.

Private anecdotes apart, the overwhelming proof is that common providers are the simplest technique of offering wonderful, well-funded, environment friendly well being care. The US spends nearly twice what we do for a privatised system that leaves them with one of many worst outcomes within the OECD.

And if Keane desires to hyperlink well being spending to the pressing want for tax reform, he may start by acknowledging that solely by offering common, reasonably than means-tested, entry to important providers akin to well being care and training can we assure that wealthier individuals will maintain up their facet of the social compact that requires them to pay proportionally extra tax to assist sturdy providers for everybody throughout society.

Certainly, if he’d learn the tax survey we revealed final week (additionally within the unopened media pack), Keane would know that greater than 60% of Australians say they might be personally prepared to pay extra tax for higher well being and aged care providers. You don’t get that stage of assist for a means-tested system.

The selection forward of us at this election is between a authorities that’s dedicated to genuinely common well being care, and an opposition that has a robust monitor report of working down Medicare to the purpose that we are going to find yourself with the system Keane would apparently choose: world-class major look after these capable of pay for it, and a threadbare security internet for the remainder of us.

If the media retains ignoring the voices of the 80% of Australians who aren’t being served by our present tax and switch system and wish reform to make sure that everybody on this rich nation can dwell a protected, wholesome and glad life, I concern the latter is what we are going to find yourself with.

Have one thing to say about this text? Write to us at letters@crikey.com.au. Please embody your full identify to be thought-about for publication in Crikey’s Your Say. We reserve the appropriate to edit for size and readability.