This evaluate compares the options of IAM software program Okta and Ping. Options embody multifactor authentication, menace detection and dashboards.
Over the previous couple of years, the rise in distant employees mixed with more and more complicated expertise stacks has made the necessity for sturdy id and entry administration even larger. Two of the most well-liked IAM instruments are Okta and Ping Identification. We’ll check out how Okta and Ping are comparable and totally different that will help you determine which resolution could also be proper for your online business.
SEE: Password breach: Why popular culture and passwords don’t combine (free PDF) (TechRepublic)
What’s Okta?
Okta took the concept of SSO expertise and moved it into the cloud. Okta is strictly a cloud based mostly resolution, and doesn’t supply on-premise help and not using a paid add-on.
What’s Ping?
Ping Identification was one of many pioneers of SSO options within the early 2000s, and has matured right into a full IAM suite that has each a cloud-based element and an on-premise possibility inbuilt. Ping focuses on inner entry to numerous firm belongings by staff as an alternative of merely authenticating on-line logins.
Okta vs. Ping: Characteristic comparability chart
| Characteristic | Okta | Ping |
|---|---|---|
| Intensive app integration | Sure | Sure |
| On-premise possibility customary | No | Sure |
| Multi-factor authentication | Sure | Sure |
| Batch permission and information export | Sure | No |
| Dashboard overview | Sure | Sure |
Head-to-head comparability: Ping vs. Okta
Dashboard
Each Ping and Okta now have accessible dashboard views to shortly entry all related consumer and login info. With Ping, that is extra of an outline chart, with the power to look additional to seek out extra info.
Okta takes the lead right here with its consumer interface and dashboard implementation. Utilizing a tile-type system that customers usually discuss with as chiclets, you possibly can shortly discover and handle totally different apps together with their related customers and permissions.
Okta additionally has an optimized browser extension that extends the utility of their dashboard. Many customers report they like this extension’s time saving options, corresponding to having the ability to handle an app with out opening it or utilizing one other tab.
Multifactor authentication
Whereas the multifactor authentication function is current in each Ping and Okta, Ping presents extra help on the subject of issues corresponding to fingerprint verification. Ping absolutely helps this function throughout many gadgets, whereas Okta solely has this for sure telephones. Implementing it for standalone readers or desktop use is a bit cumbersome, requiring customization and work-arounds.
Integrations
Each of those IAM options supply all kinds of app integrations that ought to cowl most each in style suite or instrument on the market. Okta boasts a extra streamlined interface and compatibility with a number of third-party apps corresponding to Dropbox, Slack and G-Suite. This form of compatibility makes organising your group’s entry to numerous productiveness and cloud apps a lot simpler. Their system is clearly constructed to be platform-agnostic from the bottom up, and integration with third-party apps is less complicated and quicker than Ping.
Menace detection
Okta and Ping supply an automated menace detection system that screens consumer entry in actual time.
With Okta, this function is known as ThreatInsight, which supplies information throughout the whole enterprise setting so admins could make coverage modifications proper within the IAM software program.
Ping makes use of an analogous strategy which they label API Intelligence. This extra AI-based strategy can detect real-time threats and help in making coverage modifications based mostly on current user-defined guidelines.
Is Okta or Ping best for you?
Okta presents a extra environment friendly, ground-up, full resolution to these seeking to overhaul or modernize their complete system of id and consumer administration. Ping is healthier fitted to these companies which can have an current infrastructure that they should work round, corresponding to on-premise necessities or legacy techniques.
Okta additionally presents their totally different modules individually, so you possibly can select which choices you want, which might avoid wasting cash and scale back complexity as nicely if such companies aren’t wanted. For instance, their SSO module, Common Listing, Lifecycle Administration and MFA are all separate however might be mixed to work as full all-in-one options. Ping presents a much less versatile construction, preferring to mix most features into one bundle.
Each of those IAM options are wonderful on the subject of managing entry. Each will scale back the friction of including new customers in addition to save numerous hours inside your IT division on the subject of coping with login questions or points. The selection between Okta and Ping will come right down to your particular enterprise setting and necessities.
This text was written by James Forteze.
