Nonfungible token (NFT) platform OpenSea says it’s unaware of any proof pointing to a former worker being concerned within the notorious AnubisDAO rug pull in 2021 following new accusations on social media.
In an Oct. 6 thread on X (previously Twitter), the nameless account NFT Ethics tagged OpenSea, asking it to reply to accusations that its former head of ventures, Kevin Pawlak, is linked to the pseudonymous id “0xSisyphus” and was concerned in “numerous doubtful enterprise dealings.“
1/ Pricey @OpenSea, what do you consider the truth that your Head of Ventures, Kevin Pawlak, has been concerned in numerous very doubtful enterprise dealings (e.g. Anubis) and pump & dump schemes underneath his pseudonymous id @0xSisyphus (& 0xMagellan)? pic.twitter.com/GzIVLJirLE
— NFT Ethics (@NFTethics) October 6, 2023
Each NFT Ethics and blockchain analytics account Lookonchain alleged that 0xSisyphus, and thus Pawlak, performed a key position in hyping the AnubisDAO mission to traders shortly earlier than the mission transferred the freshly raised funds to a collection of exterior wallets.
The thread by NFT Ethics tried to elucidate that Pawlak’s alleged position within the AnubisDAO rug pull was premeditated with different builders and laundered the proceeds by the memecoin Pepe (PEPE).
Nevertheless, an OpenSea spokesperson advised Cointelegraph that it was unaware of Pawlak’s involvement in any such actions however additionally famous that Palwak had a “restricted scope” whereas working there.
“Kevin is a former worker who left the corporate in June 2023. He had a restricted scope whereas at OpenSea — the place he labored in a non-management place. Now we have no consciousness of his involvement with the tasks in query.”
“Moreover, we’ve got no connection to, or details about, the tasks in query, as they befell earlier than his time at OpenSea,” mentioned the corporate consultant.
In October 2021, AnubisDAO raised 13,556 Ether (ETH) — value $60 million on the time — from crypto traders. Nevertheless, some 20 hours later, the funds have been despatched to a number of totally different pockets addresses, ensuing straight away loss for the traders.
Blockchain sleuth ZachXBT additionally appeared to throw chilly water on the accusations, saying the thread was “probably the most mid-curve” issues he’d learn.
He added that a lot of the thread appeared to base many assumptions about 0xSisyphus’ position within the alleged rug pull utilizing “unrelated occasions with out information.”
That thread is without doubt one of the most midcurve issues I’ve learn. They make many assumptions off unrelated occasions with out information.
FixedFloat does tons in quantity and similar with the opposite exchanges talked about. Right here is the supply handle of the April 2023 FixedFloat insider PEPE buys I… https://t.co/0kG2M7DNVi
— ZachXBT (@zachxbt) September 29, 2023
0xSisyphus can also be understood to have as soon as supplied a 1,000 ETH bounty to anybody who may establish the pockets handle that drained the pool and engaged legislation enforcement in each the US and Hong Kong, additional elevating doubts concerning the new accusations.
Associated: AnubisDAO’s rug-pulled 13.5K ETH washes away on Twister Money
“Is Sisyphus at fault for gross negligence for mendacity concerning the Anubis group multisig? Completely 100%. Most likely a civil case attainable for victims,” wrote ZachXBT.
ZachXBT famous that negligence, on this case, may be very totally different from stealing cash from one’s personal mission. “[As far as I know,] Sisyphus was the one group member talking with the [Department of Homeland Security].”
“You actually suppose they didn’t have a look at him first and monitor his exercise?” requested ZachXBT.
He additionally defined that the 2 actors almost certainly liable for the lack of funds in the course of the AnubisDAO scandal have been two pseudonymous customers identified solely as “Beerus” and “Ersan.”
Journal: NFT collapse and monster egos characteristic in new Murakami exhibition
