Jack Sweeney is able to go to-to-toe with Taylor Swift over the entire jet monitoring debacle.
As we’ve been following, the College of Central Florida pupil was despatched a cease-and-desist in December over the social media account @TaylorSwiftJets, which has been monitoring the pop star’s jets by publicly out there info. However that didn’t scare the 21-year-old!
Associated: Travis Kelce Addresses Kansas Metropolis Capturing In Particular New Heights Video
On Monday, the DailyMail.com obtained a duplicate of a letter Jack’s attorneys from Slater Authorized PLLC despatched in response to the cease-and-desist, and identified that the younger grownup wasn’t particularly focusing on Taylor as he additionally tracks different celebs. Additionally they identified that her letter “did not determine any authorized declare.” They wrote:
“The @taylorswiftjets account is engaged in protected speech that doesn’t violate any of Ms. Swift’s authorized rights … Your letter makes that clear by failing to determine any authorized declare. Solely in a footnote in your December 22, 2023 letter do you flirt with asserting a stalking declare underneath California legislation — however the language simply earlier than the phrases you quote explains {that a} stalker is somebody who makes a ‘credible menace’ in opposition to a sufferer … Our shoppers has by no means made any threats in opposition to Ms. Swift and your letter doesn’t recommend they’ve completed so.”
The authorized counsel added:
“Additional, your letter’s tone of alarm is unfounded. Our shoppers’ web site solely supplies the placement of personal jets utilizing publicly out there info. That info poses no menace to Ms. Swift’s security. We have no idea why you believed the very best declare in opposition to a person in Florida and his firm is a California statute, however that, mixed with the absence of any credible authorized declare, suggests a groundless effort to censor our shoppers. We doubt Ms. Swift will pursue meritless authorized motion, but when she does, we are going to defend our shoppers’ rights.”
Wow!!
They famous that they hoped their letter would “conclude the matter,” however that any future authorized letters be despatched to them straight. The response was reportedly given to Taylor on January 25 — a couple of month after her authorized workforce despatched their letter.
Taylor’s cease-and-desist claimed that Jack’s on-line exercise is posing “direct and irreparable hurt, in addition to emotional and bodily misery” on the Eras Tour performer, who’s in a “fixed state of worry for her private security” due to the monitoring. Her letter argued there may be “no reliable curiosity in or public want for this info, aside from to stalk, harass, and exert dominion and management.” However Jack responded by mentioning “info is already on the market.”
The place do you fall on this back-and-forth, Perezcious readers?? Appears like this school pupil isn’t taking part in round!! Tell us down within the feedback!
[Image via MEGA/WENN]
