Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin’s weblog put up highlighting the threats he sees synthetic intelligence (AI) might pose to humanity has attracted many fiery responses from AI and blockchain neighborhood members.
On Nov. 27, Buterin revealed a weblog put up titled My techno-optimism, which mentioned how AI is “basically totally different” from different innovations like weapons, airplanes, and social media. Moreover, Buterin defined that it might develop a brand new type of “thoughts,” which might work towards people and turn into the brand new apex species.
The weblog put up attracted discussions on varied fronts and sparked totally different sentiments on X (previously Twitter). Some voiced their settlement with the Ethereum founder, whereas others shared their criticisms of the put up.
An X account referred to as Emergent Perspective, which focuses on occasions within the web age, replied that they agree with Buterin’s ideas on the weblog put up. In response to the X consumer, individuals who argue that constructive intentions can assure that AI “can’t hurt” scare them. “That has been true of completely nothing in human historical past, and this won’t be the primary exception,” they added.
I am with @VitalikButerin on this one.
The one individuals whose opinions on #AI scare me are the individuals who argue that “Constructive Intentions = assure that AI can do no hurt.”
That has been true of completely nothing in human historical past, and this won’t be the primary exception. https://t.co/BVGwPjIbMg
— Emergent Perspective (@_emergent_) November 27, 2023
One other X consumer expressed different worries about AI. A neighborhood member who goes as “Wei Dai” on X stated that certainly one of their issues is that AI could inherently disfavor protection, decentralization, and democracy. In response to the consumer, AI might speed up the “improper mental fields,” and people pushing towards it might not be sufficient.
Associated: How decentralization can mitigate ‘dystopic’ synthetic intelligence dangers — SingularityNET exec
Not everybody agreed with Buterin’s sentiment. One other neighborhood member criticized Buterin and claimed that know-how specialists like Buterin “appear to have an entire disregard or immature view” of human psychology. The neighborhood member argued that the motivation behind constructing “morally poor” human experiences is all the time cash. The X consumer urged the neighborhood to know each issues and other people and never only one or the opposite.
the issue with Vitalik’s put up imo:
he has a predefined concept of ‘humanitarian values’
however i dont assume these are a priori
i imagine the values come after and with the techcfr horse-carriage riders when the motorcar made its intro
typically i believe he is a gud man tho https://t.co/6ZWjWT9fdZ
— 0xBlixa (@0xBlixa) November 28, 2023
In the meantime, a neighborhood member additionally argued on X that one of many issues with the weblog put up is Buterin’s predefined concept of humanitarian values. The neighborhood member defined that these shouldn’t be predefined and should come after and with the know-how.
Whereas many expressed their settlement and disagreements, others merely sat on the fence, saying they look ahead to participating in humanity’s collective effort to seek out the solutions.
Journal: Actual AI use circumstances in crypto, No. 1: The very best cash for AI is crypto
