Not responsible doesn’t imply harmless, and it’s straightforward to misconceive this. They’re various things — no person is asserted harmless by the regulation.
I learn this on the web site of a number one prison defence regulation agency, discussing a current case:
The regulation makes clear an individual is presumed to be harmless till and except confirmed to be responsible in a court docket of regulation, which suggests Mr [X] is an harmless man within the eyes of the regulation.
You possibly can guess who they had been speaking about, however I’m disinclined to provide him much more publicity. What I’m excited about is the concept, which has develop into a matter of holy writ for some, that the regulation mandates a strict binary: guilt established past affordable doubt, in any other case innocence for all functions.
Hold studying concerning the ‘messy’ reality of Australian regulation.
Change into a subscriber to get full entry to the web site, in addition to our premium newsletters.
Be part of us
Already a subscriber? Log in to maintain studying.
:quality(85):upscale()/2023/08/16/839/n/1922283/816c849964dd1eacad7ee5.20387884_.png "The Strays Human Cast Alongside Their Dog Counterparts")
