Asana and Jira are two well-liked challenge administration instruments that help agile administration.
Though each instruments show to be fairly complete, Asana is a versatile and user-friendly software that appeals to a greater variety of groups, from advertising to gross sales, design and extra. It provides a easy, visible solution to set up work, with options like process lists, kanban boards, calendars and extra.
Then again, Jira, developed by Atlassian, is a challenge administration software designed particularly for software program improvement groups. It provides a strong function set that helps agile methodologies, together with scrum and kanban boards, backlogs, dash planning instruments and extra.
1
monday.com
Staff per Firm Dimension
Micro (0-49), Small (50-249), Medium (250-999), Giant (1,000-4,999), Enterprise (5,000+)
Any Firm Dimension
Any Firm Dimension
Options
Agile Improvement, Analytics / Reviews, API, and extra
2
Quickbase
Staff per Firm Dimension
Micro (0-49), Small (50-249), Medium (250-999), Giant (1,000-4,999), Enterprise (5,000+)
Small (50-249 Staff), Medium (250-999 Staff), Giant (1,000-4,999 Staff), Enterprise (5,000+ Staff)
Small, Medium, Giant, Enterprise
Options
Agile Improvement, Analytics / Reviews, API, and extra
3
Wrike
Staff per Firm Dimension
Micro (0-49), Small (50-249), Medium (250-999), Giant (1,000-4,999), Enterprise (5,000+)
Medium (250-999 Staff), Giant (1,000-4,999 Staff), Enterprise (5,000+ Staff)
Medium, Giant, Enterprise
Options
Agile Improvement, Analytics / Reviews, API, and extra
Asana vs. Jira: Comparability desk
Options | ||
---|---|---|
Our score | ||
Beginning worth (billed month-to-month) | ||
Ease of use | ||
Agile help | ||
Native time monitoring | ||
Gantt charts | ||
|
|
Asana vs. Jira: Pricing
Asana’s pricing construction is simple, with three tiers for people and companies, together with a free tier providing primary performance with help for as much as 10 customers. However you’ll must pay for options like Gantt and Timeline views. The remaining two tiers are reserved for enterprises for which you’ll obtain pricing upon request.
As for Jira, now we have 4 tiers, with a free tier that accommodates as much as 10 customers. The 2 premium tiers after the free tier price a lot lower than related tiers in Asana. Nevertheless, when Jira is billed yearly, it does away with per-user prices with tiers that accommodate greater than 200 customers. This gives the look that, whereas Jira is accessible to smaller groups, its pricing is far more appropriate for bigger and scaling groups.
Asana pricing
- Private: Free ceaselessly.
- Starter: $10.99 per consumer monthly, billed yearly, or $13.49 per consumer monthly, billed month-to-month.
- Superior: $24.99 per consumer monthly, billed yearly, or $30.49 per consumer monthly, billed month-to-month.
- Enterprise: Customized pricing.
- Enterprise+: Customized pricing.
For extra info on Asana, learn our full Asana overview or try our Asana alternate options.
Jira pricing
- Free: Out there for as much as 10 customers.
- Commonplace: $8.15 per consumer monthly.
- Premium: $16 per consumer monthly.
- Enterprise: Customized pricing, solely billed yearly.
For extra particulars, try our full Jira Software program overview, or for different concepts, overview our Jira alternate options.
Asana vs. Jira: Characteristic comparability
Agile help
Winner: Jira
Asana helps agile challenge administration with its kanban-style boards. They’re a visible solution to handle workflows, permitting groups to trace progress with ease and prioritize duties successfully. Despite the fact that Asana’s boards are user-friendly and versatile — coupled with capabilities like customized fields and process dependencies, which can be utilized to create scrum-like workflows — it lacks a few of the superior options present in instruments particularly designed for agile improvement like Jira. Jira is a greater match for groups utilizing a extra versatile or hybrid strategy to agile.
Groups utilizing scrum or kanban methodologies will likely be proper at dwelling with Jira’s agile boards. The boards are extremely customizable and built-in with different Jira options, corresponding to backlogs and dash planning instruments. Jira’s agile capabilities are extra superior than Asana’s, offering thorough performance to handle complicated initiatives and observe progress precisely.
Native time-tracking
Winner: Tie
Asana offers a local time-tracking function for Superior, Enterprise and Enterprise+ prospects, permitting customers to maintain observe of time spent on duties instantly inside the platform. Moreover, you may combine it with a number of time-tracking instruments like Harvest, Everhour and Toggl to trace time spent on numerous duties instantly inside Asana. These integrations turn out to be useful for groups that need time monitoring however aren’t subscribed to the superior pricing tiers in Asana. They’ll additionally turn out to be useful for customers who might discover extra performance in an integration in comparison with native time monitoring.
Jira additionally has a built-in time-tracking function. Customers can log work on a difficulty and observe time spent, remaining and authentic estimates. The platform offers quite a few configuration choices for time monitoring and reporting, making it really feel like you have got better flexibility and oversight of your monitoring actions. Groups utilizing scrum or kanban methodologies will worth this, as monitoring time spent on duties helps with dash planning and managing work in progress.
Gantt charts
Winner: Asana
It may be argued that Asana’s Timeline view can provide Gantt capabilities to a sure diploma. Nevertheless, Asana does have Gantt performance impartial of its Timeline view. I discovered mapping out challenge plans visually and displaying process dependencies and timelines to be easy in Asana. These charts are simple to make use of and combine seamlessly with different challenge views, which makes it easy to change between totally different views on a challenge. Nevertheless, Asana’s Gantt function isn’t obtainable for the Private plan, although the Timeline view is.
Speaking about timeline views, Jira’s Timeline view is certainly one of its two native Gantt chart choices. With it you get the instruments and controls to trace complicated initiatives with a number of duties and big groups. Nevertheless, it’s greatest for team-level administration. The second providing is Plans, a sophisticated planning function that visualizes work for a number of groups, initiatives and even organization-wide initiatives. It’s obtainable in Jira Premium.
Ease of use
Winner: Asana
Asana is understood for its intuitive, user-friendly interface. Its design focuses on simplicity, making it simple for brand spanking new customers to get began rapidly. In comparison with Jira, I discovered it to be simpler to select up and use. The visible structure, mixed with drag-and-drop performance, made managing duties and initiatives far more intuitive. For groups searching for a low studying curve, Asana is usually a nice match. Nevertheless, it’s value noting that it has superior options that will take a while to grasp.
Jira’s interface can really feel extra complicated resulting from its intensive function set and customization choices.
Whereas Jira does an excellent job of onboarding new customers and making the platform really feel as easy to select up as doable, Jira’s strong function set and extremely technical nature work in opposition to it because it nonetheless feels complicated, particularly to the non-technical consumer. Even so, whereas this complexity is usually a problem for brand spanking new customers, Jira offers complete tutorials and documentation to assist customers navigate its options, but it surely usually requires extra time to grasp in comparison with Asana.
Buyer help
Winner: Jira
Asana provides numerous help choices, relying on the pricing plan. The free plan consists of entry to group help and primary Asana help. Paid plans present extra intensive help, with 24/7 help obtainable solely to enterprise customers. Asana additionally provides a spread of assets corresponding to tutorials, webinars and an in depth data base which can be found in most of its pricing tiers.
As for Jira, we’re extra strong buyer help throughout its pricing tiers. The free plan consists of entry to the Atlassian group. The usual plan provides native enterprise hours help, whereas the premium plan offers 24/7 help for important points. Enterprise customers profit from 24/7 help for all points and the next uptime SLA.
Safety
Winner: Tie
Asana prioritizes safety with options like knowledge encryption at relaxation and in transit and options like SAML, SIEM integration, DLP and superior admin controls obtainable in its enterprise plans. The platform complies with main trade requirements, corresponding to SOC 2 Sort II, that means that strong knowledge safety measures are continually in place.
Jira additionally has thorough safety features, notably in its premium and enterprise plans. These embody superior admin controls, SAML SSO, SCIM for consumer provisioning and encryption. Jira’s enterprise plan additionally offers extra safety measures corresponding to audit logs, BYOK encryption and compliance with numerous trade requirements, making it appropriate for organizations with stringent safety necessities.
Asana execs and cons
Execs of Asana
- Has a user-friendly interface and is very versatile.
- Visible strategy to challenge administration that makes it simpler for groups to handle their work.
- Its versatility means it’s appropriate for a variety of industries and groups.
- Asana has a variety of integrations.
Cons of Asana
- Asana lacks a few of the extra superior options present in instruments like Jira.
- Its reporting options really feel restricted in comparison with Jira.
- No native time monitoring in decrease plans.
- Might have too many options for small groups to totally make the most of
Jira execs and cons
Execs of Jira
- Give attention to agile methodologies makes it a robust software for software program improvement groups.
- Has superior reporting and analytics capabilities.
- Pricing adjusts based mostly on the variety of customers, making it nice for scaling groups.
- Has intensive Gantt performance.
Cons of Jira
- Extremely technical nature is a barrier to entry for non-technical customers.
- May be overwhelming for first-time customers.
- Has a restricted choice of challenge views.
- Collaboration instruments are restricted.
Ought to your group use Asana or Jira?
It comes right down to your wants and workflows. In case your staff values a user-friendly interface with versatile process administration, Asana is the higher alternative. Then again, in case your staff is closely invested in agile methodologies, notably in a software program improvement context, Jira might present important benefits.
Nevertheless, nothing beats first-hand expertise, and since Asana and Jira provide free plans, we encourage you to check out every software and see which one works greatest in your staff.
Select Asana if . . .
- You want a user-friendly resolution with easy agile performance.
- You want primary to intermediate challenge administration options.
- You want an answer that’s adaptable to quite a lot of groups and industries.
- You worth collaboration and communication instruments.
- You don’t need a steep studying curve in your challenge administration software.
Select Jira if . . .
- You require superior challenge monitoring alongside superior agile options.
- You want intensive customization and integration capabilities.
- You’re in a extremely technical area, particularly software program improvement.
- You already use different Atlassian instruments.
- It’s essential to have superior reporting and analytics.
Evaluation methodology
For this head-to-head, the important thing criterion for comparability was how Asana and Jira strategy agile challenge administration. We signed up for the free trials provided by each instruments for hands-on expertise with every to find out their ease of use, strengths and weaknesses. We then in contrast our findings with the platforms’ options and capabilities listed on their internet pages.
Lastly, we checked our findings in opposition to the suggestions of real-world customers to see whether or not we had related experiences. Beneath is a abstract of how they in contrast throughout standards past agile administration.
Standards | ||
---|---|---|
Options | ||
Pricing | ||
Ease of use | ||
Service and help |