 |
I've been grappling with a query for a few years: to what extent can we are saying decentralization is healthier to human society than centralization? It appears there’s nonetheless no reply passable sufficient to steer me, and lately I’ve acquired my very own solutions. Shortly talking, there are three elements of decentralization which wanted to be considered on the identical time — economics, politics, and tradition. Decentralization might occur in any of those three elements, however the financial and political decentralization can solely maintain when the tradition is decentralized, and this tradition must be based mostly on a sure sort of shared consensus. With out such a tradition, we are going to fall right into a totalitarian society very simply. Cultural evaluation is sort of absent in Web3 society, but it surely's absolutely crucial. To elucidate the argument talked about above extra particularly, I’m now serializing a piece titled "The Prehistory of Web3". This sequence start with a comparability of the Centralized China and the Decentralized West, after which will talk about the mechanism to advertise or hinder a society towards a well-balanced type of decentralization. I wonder if you assume it’s invaluable to do that, to supply a complete historic background for Web3 society. In case your reply is Sure, please upvote this thread. Let extra individuals see it and provides extra suggestions might assist to make a greater concept, which might profit us all if we collectively search for a greater web3 society. Right here is the hyperlink of the primary part of the entire sequence: https://paragraph.xyz/@prehistoryofweb3/the-prehistory-of-web3-%E2percent91percentA0-why-decentralization-is-better Hope you’ll take pleasure in it! And searching ahead to your reply:) https://preview.redd.it/xh3rwgbtbp9d1.png?width=328&format=png&auto=webp&s=fedc74af94e62d79213b420cc4026140088dd93f submitted by /u/webthreedevotee |
